Friday, June 29, 2012

Dibakar Banerjee on Wife, Films & Salman Khan Dibakar Banerjee, Bollywood, movies, films, LSD, Shanghai, Abhay Deol, Emraan Hashmi, Kalki Koechlin, Salman Khan, Karan Johar



He wants to be 16 again. When he’d visit his aunt’s home in Kolkata and pull an old mystery book out of the rustic sandook kept under the bed. “I’d curl up on the window sill and lose myself in that world,” recalls National Film Award-winning director Dibakar Banerjee. Of course, turning 16 isn’t an option. The sandook has been replaced by a fancy bookshelf. So, the next best thing to do would be to make a period whodunit thriller. And Dibakar is doing just that. “That’s the premise I always wanted to work on. A film with no social subtext, just pure entertainment,” he smiles. There was speculation that the director had chalked out another thriller based on an Agatha Christie novel. Dibakar rubbishes the rumours. ‘‘The film is being written as we speak and the art direction research is happening.’’ He says excitedly, ‘‘My next film will be extremely romantic and lush. It’s something I’ve never done before.’’

He talks about his latest release Shanghai; a political thriller with Emraan Hashmi, Abhay Deol and Kalki Koechlin in the lead. “I knew exactly how much money the movie would make in each sector,” he says. “The title of the film is a comment on what we are as a nation,” says he. “We don’t like living in our own country. In our minds, we want to migrate to a foreign land. The film’s about the Shanghai of our dreams and how we are fighting to achieve that.

Dibakar has hit the bull’s eye thrice. His earlier films Khosla Ka Ghosla (KKG, about middle-class dreams), Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye! (OLLO, a satirical comedy) and Love, Sex Aur Dhokha (LSD, about love and betrayal) appealed to both, critics and audiences. But Shanghai dealt with a different beast altogether — politics. “I do every film with a sense of freshness and innocence. I look for something that nobody will expect.” The political thriller, he says, wasn’t about politicians in khadi but the effect of politics on the common man. “Politicians decide our lives for us. Shanghai was all about that. Politics just added colour to my film.”

In an industry which is largely driven by tried-and-tested formulae, money and stars, Dibakar has doled out four diametrically different, out-of-the-box films without a big budget or star presence. “In my films, the story is most important. The stars have to decide if they want to shed their persona for my film,” says the ex-adman. “It’s a huge risk for them. Only a secure actor or someone who wants to reinvent his image would do it. Emraan was strong enough to take a risk withShanghai.”

Indian cinema is divided between mainstream and art but Dibakar has only one way of looking at films. “There are boring films and there are non-boring films. The audience also follows the same yardstick,” says he. “I look down upon the looking down on any kind of films. I don’t belong to the school of filmmakers who ‘diss’ a film.”  He adds, “Stars and filmmakers have complimented my work. No one till date has told me, ‘Yaar tu aisi arty picturein kyun banata hai (why do you make such arty films)?’ If they have the generosity to compliment me, then why should I point a finger at them?”

He believes that audiences prefer to watch a Salman Khan film because of the much-needed escape from their day-to-day problems, which his films provide. “If we don’t have commercial entertainers, India will implode as a society,” says he. “Salman Khan holds the country together. He is one of the many reasons why India is still united.” His take onBodyguard? “What’s so wrong with the film?” he retorts, “It’s a comedy. What I love about Bodyguard is that it’s not taking itself seriously at all.” On being asked whether he’d ever make such a film, he shakes his head. “No, because I don’t think like that,” he smiles.

What he’s clear about is that his work should be bigger than him. “My films are not known because of me. I am known because of them,” he says. He doesn’t believe in being seen at events or branding himself. “If I start wearing fancy clothes to parties, it won’t do me any good. I’m 5’7”, nerdy-looking, shy and the retiring type. I’d rather take the way where my films lead me,” he says.

Where writing his films is concerned, he states honestly, “I’m not a good solo writer, I’m better co-writing a script. Maybe, four films down the line I’ll become a good writer. As of now, I’m still learning.” Nevertheless, the director enjoys writing dialogues but doesn’t take credit for them. “I observe people. I love the different ways in which people talk. I lead a life where I’m exposed to both, a CEO and the taxiwallah. This helps me write better dialogues.”

He has a realistic take on himself too. “Producers don’t come to me because I’m some great filmmaker; it’s because they know I’ll make something different and not play around with their money. I have a profit stake in my films too,” he says, adding, “I don’t want to be known as this intellectual director. I produce my films. Every penny I earn from them actually goes into my daughter’s education.”

Dibakar says that his wife (Richa) and daughter (Ira) don’t have too much to do with his films. “I hope my daughter doesn’t see my films till she’s 18. Right now, she’s just two-and-a-half,” he laughs. As for his wife and him, they live in a completely different world. “My wife and I like to watch Ingmar Bergman films. Today, she asked me to get Reds, a film by Warren Beatty. We hardly discuss my films.”

But she helps streamline his creativity. “She’s an avid reader and a keen observer. I use her as a ‘bullshit’ detector. She’s fantastic at that,” he laughs. There are many other things that interest the couple. “She’s an antique hunter and traveller. She leads our travelling itinerary. Once a year, we take a cultural tour.”  Their new obsession is designing a home in Goa. He says, “We’ve got many things to discuss, apart from my films. My films cover only 10 per cent of our life.”

I refer to his recent interview, where he said he didn’t spend money on ‘lehengas’. Was it an indirect dig at Karan Johar? “The budget of a song in Karan’s film is the total budget of my film.” He adds, “There are certain films where people come to see how heroes are dressed. But the audience comes to see how my characters behave. That’s the difference.”

Dibakar claims that his frugal stance is self-imposed and he is content with whatever he has achieved. “I’m happy having a cheaper SUV and one bedroom less in my house. But mind you, when I shoot my period whodunit thriller, which can only be evoked by its costumes, you can bet your a** I’m going to spend double the amount Karan spends on his lehengas,” he laughs. “And I will probably go to Karan for advice.”

My Shanghai Cast
Abhay Deol
There’s something enigmatic about him. I like watching him over some other star or actor. Both of us have similar tastes in films and music. That makes for a creative partnership. Also, Abhay always tries to give much more than the script demands but in a subtle way. When I’m shooting him, I don’t realise a lot of nuances that he has added to the scene. It’s only when I’m on the edit table that I appreciate it.

Emraan Hashmi
Emraan is not a manufactured identity. He’s here by the dint of his own achievements. That’s what intrigued me about him. Whatever role he plays, he makes it look believable. The guy has a deep understanding of what he’s doing in front of the camera. He knows something that many people don’t — how to be on camera and maintain a direct relationship with the audience. His focus is scary. He would always reach five minutes before time for workshops while the others would invariably walk in late.

Kalki Koechlin
Her role was by far the strongest that any other girl has attempted in any of my films. She’s there from the first to the last frame, sharing the same screen time as Abhay and Emraan.

On My Peers 
Karan Johar
Karan handles a set of emotions that I don’t — love in youth. The love that an 18 to 22-year-old boy feels for a girl and vice versa. It is a distinct emotion. During that age, we’re a different species. After 25, we change fundamentally. That understanding is Karan’s forte. Karan has given a whole generation a way of saying, ‘I love you’. Not everyone can do it. At one point, Guru Dutt and Raj Kapoor used to do it. Today, Karan and Aditya Chopra excel in it. Remember, 60 per cent of our audience is young.

Anurag Kashyap
Anurag is the only guy who prevents me from being complacent. He’s directing, producing, writing, acting, lobbying for his films and even his friends’ films. But what Anurag creates is a domino effect, a vibe or a sea of activity which gets you excited. If Anurag hadn’t made Dev D, I wouldn’t have had the courage to make LSD. You know someone’s trying to up the ante. He makes me feel ‘insecure’ in a positive way.

Shimit Amin
I was hugely impressed by Ab Tak Chappan (ATC). I want the same Shimit back. He’s a director who understands silence. ATC is a tremendously silent film. At the same time, it’s so thrilling, violent and unrelenting. It was a new take. He showed how with less dialogue, the scene could be made extraordinary. If the movie had been marketed well, it could’ve reached somewhere else.
Sanjay Leela Bhansali
I liked Saawariya, which no one liked. I preferred the film over Devdas. I enjoyed the texture. Although, the commercial elements in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam didn’t appeal to me, Sanjay proved his mastery in the way he portrayed feminine beauty in Aishwarya Rai’s introductory shot. I copy him but in a way that nobody can tell.

Movie Review: The Amazing Spider-Man Reviews, Movie Review, hollywood, movies, emma stone, Andrew Garfield






What's hot:
We like the way Spider-Man uses his web to draw Gwen into his arms for a burning kiss!
What's not:
Emma Stone is vibrant but nothing to write home about.
 verdict:
With great power… you try to fight the feeling of déjà vu that you get watching angst-y Peter Parker getting bullied by a popular high school athlete, getting tongue-tied in front of his crush, and seeing him transform from dorky teenager to ‘amazing’ superhero! Since Spider-Man reboot has very few new things to offer, it boils down to one and only question – is Mark Webb’s Spider-Man (Andrew Garfield) as remarkable as Sam Raimi’s Spidey (Toby McGuire)?
RATING:

Director: Mark Webb
Cast: Emma Stone, Andrew Garfield, Rhys Ifans

The filmmakers advertised this movie as “The Untold Story” of Spider-Man’s origin. So when Peter Parker’s school teacher chides him saying, “Don’t make promises you can’t keep”, you almost give out a chuckle. Because those are the exact words you want to throw at director Sam Raimi’s face with 3D technology!

Spider-Man reboot has very few new things to offer. In fact, it is with great power… that you try to fight the feeling of déjà vu that you get watching angst-y Peter Parker getting bullied by a popular high school athlete, getting tongue-tied in front of his crush, and seeing him transform from dorky teenager to ‘amazing’ superhero!

Apart from some breathtakingly first-rate 3D effects and the fact that Peter’s love interest is a blonde and not a red-haired girl, this movie has more or less the same story that you saw a decade ago. That’s why it boils down to one and only question – is Mark Webb’s Spider-Man (Andrew Garfield) is as remarkable as Sam Raimi’s Spidey (Toby McGuire)?

Well, he is!

Andrew Garfield is not as sweet as Toby was; but he is such a cutie! Whether as a nerdy teenager who finds it difficult to stand up for himself or profess his love or as a confident, bordering on smugness superhero, who thinks fighting crime is exhilarating!

Webb’s spidey is like any other teenager. He simply cannot live without his computer, and especially not without his cell phone and skateboard. What other thing we like about him is, he is crazy about Gwen (Emma Stone). In fact, in one of the scenes when the entire Manhattan is in danger, before going about his saving-the-world routine he calls up Gwen from his phone to check on her! Cute, eh?!

We also like the way Webb’s spidey uses the strands of his web to get a feel of what is around him. Or the way puts his arachnid power to use on petty criminals for sheer amusement. And how can we forget to mention the way he uses his web to draw Gwen into his arms for a burning kiss!

If The Amazing Spider-Man is worth watching, it’s because of Andrew Garfield. Emma Stone is vibrant but nothing to write home about. Rhys Ifans, as a scientist-turned-giant-lizard, somehow fails to scare you. Maybe because he is not entirely a full-on bad guy in the movie. Let’s see what’s in store for him in the sequel.

There’s still enough time before Batman (The Dark Knight Rises) comes to entertain you. In the mean time, go watch this new chaosmonger in town in unitard; he won’t disappoint you!

Supermen Of Malegaon Movie Review Supermen Of Malegaon film review










Tucked away somewhere in Bollywood we have a factory that churns out remakes of Hollywood, Tollywood and Mollywood to good effect. Oshiwara is where the 'intellectuals' put their head together. The characters are picked up as it as and even scenes are 'lifted'. Some go on to become Bollywood blockbusters raking in the crores. Why, there have even been tunes replicated to Hindi lyrics! 

What SUPERMEN OF MALEGAON does is turn plagiarism on its head. It sets a benchmark for rural creativity that can find its audience at the international arena. Faiza Ahmad Khan concocts a heady mix of originality tempered with a huge dose of raw creativity to deliver a killer brew that is sure to have you leaving the multiplex high on thinking differently. Actually, you don't want to leave your seat even after the movie has ended because the director has you begging for more. When was the last time you had this feeling? 



SUPERMEN OF MALEGAON is a crisp 60-minute documentary on the life of the people of Malegaon that is actually a smartly told feature. If marketed aggressively, this can turn out to be a bigger blockbuster than ROWDY RATHORE. But unfortunately, films with intellectual content have few takers. 

Malegaon has become notoriously famous for its blasts over the last few years. The tension between the Hindu Muslim communities is what director Faiza starts with. For one moment, my heart sinks. Not another of those Hindu-Muslim lessons I think to myself. But thankfully, that is not what she dwells upon. She deflects from that topic as quickly as she touches upon it, to dig deep into the lives of the people of Malegaon fighting economic depression to make ends meet. Theirs is an endless saga of working in the power loom. On Friday's however, their lives and mind get a break. This is when they escape into fantasy land immersing themselves into the world of movies. 

They cannot be movie stars, but that does not stop them from dreaming of being a star. One such character is known for making blockbusters. His name is Nazir Shaikh. A spoof on SHOLAY has given him the bravado to attempt more and his budget is just Rs 50,000 for a movie. The ingenuity with which he spoofs Gabbar and his gang using cycles instead of horses is hilarious. ''The movie ran for over two months,'' he informs us through an interviewer. ''Tickets were even sold in black.' There is no sense of puffed up pride when he delivers this line, but just nonchalance. As if to say, 'what is the big deal.'' 





Done with Bollywood, he now wants to give the locals of Malegaon a dose of Hollywood. Superman is his next stop, with a comic take. This Superman will fly to the nearest mobile tower, when on ground, if the network is weak! He wears rubber slippers with red socks worn over blue ill-fitting pants tucked under a red short pant with the thread (keeping it together) hanging out. The emblem is M instead of S and the director tells us that this is not a lift. ''We have just taken the idea but the story is completely different. There are different situations unlike the one you saw in the Superman series. This Superman is a comic character, so where is the copying?'' he asks. 

With such confidence as attitude, it is no wonder then that he is adept at getting his cast at rock bottom rates along with the accessories. The camera used is a Handy cam, but there are special effects at the editing table which is bargained for Rs,10,000. 



Shaikh also wonders how there are so many people involved in making a movie... cameraman, make-up artist, sound engineer, editor, etc... ''I do everything,'' he says. ''I did not even know what I was doing was called editing until someone told me,'' he laughs. It is lines like these that endear you to the plot. This is apart from the careful selection of characters both for the movie and for the movie within the movie. 

SUPERMEN OF MALEGAON should be our entry at the Oscars. This is movie-making of a different kind. Faiza Ahmed Khan has shown us what she is capable of. Time for us to celebrate her genius. 

The five star rating is for the concept, content and delivery style. But more importantly, it is for the fearless manner in which this idea has been given shape to. Kudos to PVR Director's Rare, which is throwing its doors open to meaningful cinema and film-makers that would have otherwise been lost in the crowd. 

Rating - 5/5

Sonam Kapoor: I'm An Alpha Female There’s no doubt in Sonam Kapoor’s mind that when it comes to Bollywood, she owns the fashion space










There’s no doubt in Sonam Kapoor’s mind that when it comes to Bollywood, she owns the fashion space

The ‘break’ has you looking fresh and fit…

I took time off to concentrate on myself. I joined dance classes to lose weight. I didn’t want to work out. I’m doing modern jazz and it’s good fun.

What made you take this break?
If you keep on working with no time to travel, read and form relationships, you stop growing. As an artiste, you need to interact and move around to be able to tell more stories. I had to take time off to grow. I also did a bit of research for my next film, Raanjhnaa. Many actresses keep doing repetitive work because they’ve stopped growing. I took time off from the movies to concentrate on the relationships and people in my life. I don’t want to be a part of the rat race. It’s not in my personality. In the past, I lost my way and got carried away by what people told me to do. Now, I’ll do what I want.

A lot of introspection seems to have happened…
This sabbatical gave me time to think. It made me realise who my real friends in the industry are. I also realised people missed me when I wasn’t around. You can’t imagine the number of calls and messages I’ve received in the past two months. It made me feel good. It felt nice to be wanted. The break also made me realise who I am. I read, travelled and visited museums. 

Will the time-off have an effect on your career?
Absolutely! The best part was that it made me think how I should take my career forward. I have a niche audience. They don’t like to see me in completely commercial films nor do they want to see me in arty ones. I got rave reviews for my roles in arty films like Saawariya, Delhi 6 and Mausam but the films didn’t do well. Somehow, masala potboilers likeThank You and Players also didn’t work with the audience. They want to see me in films, which have an amalgamation of art and entertainment. I Hate Luv Storys and Aisha are two such films. The middle ground works for me. I guess this sets me apart.  During the break, I read a lot of scripts and said no to three big films. I’ve just signed Raanjhnaa.

What made you sign Raanjhnaa?
I chose the film because of director Anand L Rai (of Tanu Weds Manu fame). He may not be an experienced director but he’s an honest person. He’s not making the film for money. It isn’t a big film and I’m cast opposite Dhanush, a first timer in Hindi films. But it doesn’t bother me. I’m happy that I’m working with an honest bunch of people, who want to make a good film. It’s a beautiful love story and my role is meaty.

Reports say you have a lot of creative control on the set. True?
I don’t have creative control over the film. I’m just a part of the costumes brainstorming team. Anand was travelling and he requested me to sit with the designers and discuss my clothes. Even Sanjay Leela Bhansali (Saawariya) and Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra (Delhi 6) gave me a free hand in deciding my clothes and look in their films. In Aisha and I Hate Luv Storys, I didn’t have any say. In Raanjhnaa, I’m doing a lot of research about the character and her costumes. It’s a good feeling to be so involved in a film.

What happens when you don’t like your clothes and don’t have a say?
Usually, I make sure I work with designers whom I trust. There have been times when I have put my foot down because I didn’t like the clothes. But there have also been times when I didn’t like the clothes but couldn’t do much about it. InThank You, I didn’t like my look but the director (Anees Bazmee) insisted on that particular look. I didn’t understand what was going on in the film anyway. I was like a fish out of water. Since then, I have made up my mind not to let this happen and never to get into such uncomfortable situations. I’m an intelligent girl and won’t leave my brains behind.

How does it feel teaming up with Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra again for Bhaag Milkha Bhaag?
It’s nice working with him. It’s the same team as Delhi 6 and I feel in sync. They give me creative control as well. They know my weaknesses and strengths and I know theirs. I feel at home. Rakeysh has faith in my talent and I give my best with him. That sort of confidence is amazing for a young girl like me.

Your film with Rajkumar Santoshi didn’t materialise, right?
I’d love to work with Mr Rajkumar Santoshi but the producers (Eros) also need to be happy with the casting. I have agreed to do the film but nothing is official yet. Abhay Deol might be cast opposite me.

Are you doing Punit Malhotra’s next?
I don’t know. But I hope to do it. As I said earlier, it all depends on the totality of the film. Will I suit the film? Will the producer be happy? I’d love to work with Karan Johar and Punit but they haven’t offered me anything.

You have done just one film with Dharma Productions and none so far with Yash Raj Films. Aren’t you losing out on something?
I don’t look for big banners. I have worked with the biggest filmmakers — like Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Rakeysh Mehra. I produce films myself. There have been talks with YRF but nothing has worked out yet.

While actresses want to work with established heroes, you have no qualms about working with new guys, the latest being Dhanush…
My journey has been different. I started off with a debutant, Ranbir Kapoor. When I worked with Imran Khan, he had four flops behind him. I Hate Luv Storys was his first hit after Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na. When I worked with Abhay, nobody knew him much. He was doing films like Manorama Six Feet Under, which had an initial of  Rs 80,000. Dev D hadn’t even released then. So, in a way, I brought Abhay Deol to mainstream cinema. Dhanush is popular because of Kolaveri di but no one knows him as an actor here. What’s more important is that I have a good role. If I work with Ranbir, I know he’ll have the best role. I too want the best role. One actor I really want to work with is Sharman Joshi. He’s amazing. 

So it would be better roles over big films?
I’d rather do an unsuccessful film in which I have a good role. I don’t care about the scale of the film as long as I have a fine role and the critics appreciate me. People will always remember Naina from Players. They’ll remember me as the girl who drove fast cars and brandished the middle finger. None of the actresses have gained from being a Khan heroine. They may be doing big films but it does nothing for their careers. I can’t fit into such films. I’m an alpha female.

Thirty years hence, what would you like to be known as?As a very good actor. A few astrologers have even told me that I’ll be acting till the last day of my life.

Does your image as a fashionista overpower your image as an actress?Absolutely! If I had a lot of hit films and had been at the top of the line, then it could have been balanced. There’s so much competition when it comes to acting but on the fashion scene, there’s no one except me. No other actress is called a fashion icon. At the risk of sounding, immodest, I own the fashion space. I’m the epicentre of style. I love fashion, clothes and designers. Some actresses are known for their relationships and scandals, I’d rather be known for my fashion.

Esha Deol's Wedding Photos Abhay Deol and Preeti Desai were spotted hand in hand. How cute is that? Hema Malini and Dharmendra performing a wedding ritual. Fardeen Khan looked dapper in a beige-coloured sherwani. Someone needs to give Rani Mukerji a few style lessons. While we like her sari, the gold jewellery simply doesn’t match her outfit. Look at Nita Ambani all decked up! Don’t forget to check out her red hot nail piant.

In Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding Photos

In Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding Photos


In Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding PhotosIn Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding PhotosIn Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding Photos


In Pics: Esha Deol's Wedding Photos

Samsung Galaxy S III for T-Mobile review





If three's a crowd, the Samsung Galaxy S III party in the US is about to get pretty stuffy. Having already reviewed AT&T and Sprint's variants -- not to mention the original I9300 before them -- we're now ready to put a third iteration through its paces, this time from the country's fourth-largest carrier, T-Mobile.

Of course, the phone itself needs no grand introduction, as it's fast become the new darling of the smartphone world. And rightfully so, in many respects: it's the first high-end device to launch on all four major mobile operators in the US (a feat in and of itself), and it's done so with minimal carrier branding, hardware changes or bloatware levies. It is, in essence, an unadulterated handset. The reason this piece of news is so wondrous is that it opens up your ability to choose your phone service based on the network, not on the actual phone each individual carrier offers.

Sadly, the big tradeoff here is the loss of an Exynos quad-core processor in exchange for a Snapdragon S4 dual-core chipset and additional RAM. Join us as we take a deeper look at the T-Mobile Galaxy S III. Is it the best phone on the network? Is it worth shelling out $280 (with a two-year contract) for the 16GB model or $330 for 32GB? How well does it perform? This and more answers await you in our full review below.
Hardware
Perhaps you've read our reviews on the global Galaxy S III (aka the I9300) or our shootout involving the AT&T and Sprint versions. If so, you'll understand if our hardware section is a wee bit briefer than in a standard review. Here's the concern: so little is different with T-Mobile's model -- the SGH-T999 -- that you'll have an awfully difficult time distinguishing between this one and the others. But with each and every version we review, we continue to be amazed at how Samsung was so effectively able to leverage its brand and convince all four major US carriers (and a couple regional ones too) to give up nearly all opportunities to differentiate themselves. No logos on the front. No frilly firmware tweaks beside the basic pre-loaded apps. No exclusivity agreements. In fact, we were flabbergasted even by the fact that American consumers had the GSIII in their fingertips within a month after the European release.
Yes, the SGH-T999 does have a unique trait, but it's in the radio setup tailored to T-Mobile's frequencies: the device is the only version in the US that offers HSPA+ / WCDMA with AWS radio support (850 / AWS / 1900 / 2100), as well as the usual quadband GSM / EDGE coverage for global roaming. And as T-Mobile's LTE-Advanced network won't be deployed until next year, no support is found for the next-gen speeds. But beyond that, it features the same 2,100mAh battery under the hood, along with a micro-SIM slot and a microSD reader that supports SDXC (meaning you can pop in 64GB microSD cards if you so desire, pushing your total capacity up to 80GB). The edges of the phone are all as anticipated: 3.5mm headphone jack and noise cancellation mic on top, micro-USB / MHL dock down south, power / screen lock button on the right and volume rocker over to the left.

Let's go over a few other details. First, despite reports of some US models only taking advantage of 1GB of RAM, we were able to confirm that the T-Mobile, Sprint and AT&T versions all have a full 2GB. Since all US iterations use a Snapdragon S4 1.5GHz dual-core processor rather than the international's quad-core Exynos, this is a helpful compromise to ensure American users enjoy a smooth performance. It's also a huge bar-raiser for flagship devices that will make their debut sometime this year -- if a smartphone doesn't offer that extra gigabyte of memory, it had better be extremely efficient with the RAM it already has.

The extra gigabyte of RAM makes the phone a huge bar-raiser for future devices.

At 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches (136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6mm), the dimensions of T-Mobile's Galaxy S III are -- you guessed it -- completely identical to every single one of its counterparts. Color us pleasantly surprised, since carriers have cited the inclusion of AWS as an excuse to revamp lesser phones. We're happy to report, then, that not a single metaphorical hair has been touched here, and everything fits in the chassis exactly the way it should. The gentle curves on the back and edges make the Galaxy S III very comfortable to hold, though anyone with smaller hands may still feel more at ease with T-Mobile's other star phone, the petite HTC One S. Fortunately, the GSIII doesn't add as much width to the frame as you'd expect, so it's really not as bad as the 0.5-inch difference implies.

The best part of this cross-carrier compatibility might be the interchangeable battery and back lids. Granted, we're not raving fans of accessorizing our covers, but the fact that we can swap them and the batteries means we can look forward to an incredibly wide variety of accessories. After all, a healthy ecosystem (and tens of millions of phone users) will be plenty of incentive for companies to come up with a plethora of offerings in this department. Plus, having multiple batteries at your disposal isn't too shabby either.

We borrowed a pebble blue unit to use for our T-Mobile tests, which was the same color as the AT&T device we played with last week. Yet for some inexplicable reason, we felt that T-Mo's cover was more prone to fingerprints than its AT&T counterpart. We doubt this will be of much concern for those of you interested in the white model, since smudges are difficult to see on that surface. Yes, the plastic bits on the Galaxy S III do feel a tad frail, especially when you're taking the covers off and nearly bending the thing in half in the process. Still, we didn't feel any worse off with this phone than any other Samsung devices we've tested.
But the important part is not how it feels, it's how it holds up. The front face is coated with second-generation Gorilla Glass, which should help fortify the phone against routine wear and tear, as well as keep the display safe from scratches. Of course, though, we doubt it'll actually protect the panel from cracking if you drop it from waist-level or higher. While we haven't had the opportunity to kick this thing around of our own accord, we encourage you to hit up the More Coverage link at the bottom of this post if you want to see a few durability tests in action.

Nothing is lost on the gorgeous Super AMOLED HD display, a PenTile panel whose 1280 x 720 resolution translates into a pixel density of 306ppi. We've seen better, but by no means is the Galaxy S III display an eyesore. Viewing angles are not as wide as what you'll find on the HTC One X; once you start getting close to edge-on, you begin losing much of the rich color and readability you'd enjoy on the X. But let's be real here: while we're completely dazzled by the One X's screen, we doubt many users will find themselves angry that they can't look at it from oblique side angles.
Software
Again, we had a difficult time detecting any noticeable differences here. Isn't it glorious? The same firmware experience on the other models -- even the global version -- can be had on the T-Mobile version, save for a few carrier-specific applications that we'll discuss in a moment. This time around, we're not going to lecture the masses on the merits or hazards of Samsung's proprietary TouchWiz UI as seen on the latest version of Android (4.0.4, to be specific), because we've done so at length already in our past reviews. But it's there, it's heavy and the firmware is identical.


Now, about those pre-loaded apps. You'll find a grand total of 49 applications when you boot up the device for the first time --that's the most we've seen of the three US models we've reviewed so far (AT&T had 42; Sprint, 47). What's on board here? Access T-Mobile, Amazon, Game Hub, Mobile Hotspot, Music Hub, More Services, T-Mobile Name ID, T-Mobile TV and Visual Voicemail. Also, we'd be remiss if we didn't mention that the Music Hub is nothing but a pretty icon at the moment -- it doesn't actually launch the app but instead tells us that service will be available soon.
Visual Voicemail is a nice feature to have, but the transcription service commands a monthly subscription fee. Access T-Mobile just takes you into a web browser and lets you view your account information. The Mobile Hotspot shortcut feels a bit cumbersome since the ability to tether comes included in the Galaxy S III, but the most useless shortcut of all is for More Services, which is essentially just a subsection of Samsung Apps (an app market already featured on the GS III).
Of the 49 built-in apps, we found 10 couldn't be uninstalled or disabled. Interestingly enough, the only piece of T-Mobile software included on this list was More Services. If you simply can't stand seeing this (or any other) icon taking up space in your precious app tray, TouchWiz includes an option to hide those apps from sight.

While the HTC One S offers a max of 41GB with Dropbox support included, the Galaxy S III starts at a minimum of 66GB.

T-Mobile is one of the carriers that has chosen to include a complimentary 50GB of Dropbox storage space (something thatAT&T and Verizon refuse to do). As it is, this is better than the 25GB allotment for HTC One S users, but the difference feels even more drastic when you factor in the microSD reader included on the GSIII. For kicks and giggles, we did the math on total storage space included with both phones (and that includes Dropbox): the HTC One S offers 41GB, while the GSIII starts with 66GB, going all the way up to 146GB (the discrepancy depends on whether you purchase the 16GB or 32GB model, and if you get a microSD / microSDXC card to supplement that storage). And we're not even counting any other cloud services you might use. If you take a lot of high-res photos, have a large movie library or store your entire music collection on your phone, Samsung is easily the better choice for you.
Performance and battery life
Allow us to echo the sentiments of our last Galaxy S III review: the T-Mobile model performs on par with its US brethren, though none of the Snapdragon S4-powered phones can match the I9300's quad-core Exynos chip. If you observe them closely enough in a side-by-side comparison, you may see a rise in overall performance (especially in graphics processing), but unless you're the nitpickiest of power users you won't notice that delta. The top of the US market is dominated by Snapdragon S4 at the moment, and we've always been completely satisfied with how smooth and polished everything is. We didn't see any stuttering when multitasking, playing games, or using the internet -- in fact, we couldn't spot any tiling at all when loading the Engadget home page on the stock browser.
Below you'll see two tables: the first one offers a comparison between the GSIII and the HTC One S, its primary competitor on T-Mobile. The second table illustrates how this model compares with the rest of the Galaxy S III units we've reviewed so far.
T-Mobile Galaxy S III (SGH-T999)T-Mobile HTC One S
Quadrant5,0325,053
Vellamo2,3602,452
AnTuTu6,8687,067
SunSpider 0.9.1 (ms)1,7641,742
GLBenchmark Egypt Offscreen (fps)5457
CF-Bench8,7599,547
Battery life8:589:10
SunSpider: lower scores are better
T-Mobile (SGH-T999)Global Galaxy S III (GT-I9300)AT&T (SGH-I747)Sprint (SPH-L710)
Quadrant5,0324,4545,0845,130
Vellamo2,3601,7512,1532,117
AnTuTu6,86811,9606,7136,536
SunSpider 0.9.1 (ms)1,7641,4601,9261,882
GLBenchmark EgyptOffscreen (fps)
54995454
CF-Bench8,75913,1109,4399,567
Battery life8:589:029:059:20
SunSpider: lower scores are better
T-Mobile hasn't done much to tweak the Galaxy S III's battery life, as the 2,100mAh juicepack cranked through our standard video rundown test for eight hours and 58 minutes before powering down. Even though this is the shortest we've seen so far for the lineup of Samsung flagships, it only misses the international version's mark by four minutes and AT&T's by seven (though admittedly, AT&T's model was tested using LTE, whereas T-Mobile is on HSPA+). We're not going to lose valuable sleep over the discrepancy, and you shouldn't, either -- we were still able to get a full day of extensive and productive use (a day and a half for moderate users), and if you find yourself in a worst-case scenario, its compatibility with other carriers' models should mean that plenty of extra batteries will be available online.
GPS performed amicably alongside the two other US variants. Within three to four seconds, the maps had us pinned down to within 60 meters of our location -- and after getting a stronger pinpoint, it gradually inched even closer to our true whereabouts. Just as we found when comparing the AT&T and Sprint models, the Sprint version was the straggler when we brought it up against T-Mo's model. That's not to say the L710 was terrible -- it just didn't find us quite as fast as the other two. (As a side note, Sprint's was the only one connected to WiFi at the time, since the network's 3G connections are quite atrocious in comparison. This goes to show that even WiFi assistance couldn't help its GPS be more accurate in a timely manner.) Additionally, the Galaxy S III throws in support for GLONASS, Russia's global network for satellite positioning. With the ability to ping more satellites, accuracy and lockdown time are both improved. We've seen a few other smartphones with support for both systems, and we hope to see this become a growing trend amongst mid-range and low-end devices.

The Galaxy S III offers both GPS and GLONASS support, enabling faster locks and improved accuracy.

As with the other GSIII units, we greatly enjoyed the volume and tonal range of the external speakers, which make it ideal for music and conference calls. Listening to songs with headphones was a happy experience, and all of our calls sounded crystal clear through the speakers. If you live in an area with inconsistent T-Mobile coverage, the network also adds in its WiFi calling feature to help ensure conversations don't get dropped or ruined by a patchy signal.
Camera
We're not going to say anything different than what we've said before: the Galaxy S III's camera is among the smartphone greats, and T-Mobile hasn't done anything to screw that up. In addition to having a full suite of customization settings, the 8-megapixel sensor comes with autofocus, an f/2.6 lens and the ability to lock exposure and focus when holding down the shutter. And to honor the general mantra of Ice Cream Sandwich, shutter lag is incredibly short and almost instantaneous. We also love the camera's low-light performance, mainly thanks to having multiple choices such as night / candlelight / sunset / dawn modes, flash and HDR. That last option was our favorite tool when attempting to capture sunsets, or when we just needed a small boost in light without a major increase in noise (night mode could capture more errant light, but graininess was an unfortunate side effect).
In comparison, we didn't see anything in the T-Mobile version's still camera performance that stood out amongst its siblings. We've added a gallery for each US GSIII below to help you compare the results.
Feature-wise, it has all of the options we've come to expect in a top-notch Galaxy-class smartphone: plenty of scene modes, autofocus, macro focus, face detection, ISO (up to 800), white balance (daylight, shade, incandescent and fluorescent), panorama mode, geotagging, HDR, exposure adjustments, flash and the ability to edit shortcuts. It also has a few filters, offers burst shot, smile shot, anti-shake, a timer and the option of compressing your images. In this way, it's a Samsung device through and through -- these are exactly the types of options you'd see in a standard point and shoot.
The T-Mobile Galaxy S III is capable of capturing 1080p HD video, while the front-facing cam can hook you up with 720p for some decent video chatting. But first, let's discuss that rear camcorder. It captures the level of detail we like to see in a premier smartphone and has no problem keeping up with moving objects. We have just one concern, and it's the same that we had with Sprint's GSIII: the autofocus was constantly working throughout many of our videos (in both 720p and 1080p resolutions). At least it was subtle and didn't make itself a nuisance, but when looking carefully enough at the footage, we could definitely see the feature attempting to make adjustments several times in the video. Autofocus does have its usefulness in video capture, but only in specific scenarios, and not when it appears in the movie so many times. Footage taken with the front-facing camera didn't suffer from this problem because the sensor lacks that feature, and motion turned out pretty smooth. Our only nitpick is that it doesn't offer the same amount of clarity you'll find on the rear cam.
Pricing and comparison
T-Mobile's flavor of Galaxy S III will come in marble white and pebble blue, with either 16GB or 32GB of internal storage. The entry-level model can be had for $280 with a two-year commitment, with the 32GB version running $330 -- and before any mail-in rebates are applied. Even then, this particular version of the flagship device still ends up costing $80 more than any of the other carriers at the time of launch. The worst part is that there's no reasonable explanation for that extra financial commitment that T-Mobile is asking. Its componentry is the same as on the other Galaxy S IIIs, with the only exceptions being that AWS is included whereas LTE is not. This move seems contrary to Magenta's mantra of being a lower-budget alternative to AT&T and Verizon. Is the carrier going into the GSIII launch half-hearted? Does it believe that its loyal customers will pay the upfront cost regardless of how it compares to the company's competitors? Whatever the reason, it's one of the few flaws we've found with this otherwise excellent deal.
Sure, the price will go down over time, as all phones do, but how long will it take? Will this sway fencesitters trying to decide between this and the One S? Perhaps. It would be so much easier if these two phones could be the same exact price -- then, it's easily a matter of comparing oranges with oranges. But it's not so cut-and-dried: the Galaxy S III is the best T-Mobile device based on the spec sheet, but the One S is lighter, thinner and less expensive (even more so with web-only specials), all factors that may garner quite a few sales. Since most potential T-Mobile buyers looking for a premier device will be trying to decide between these two handsets, we've compiled a chart showing how the two phones fare next to each other blow-by-blow.
T-Mobile Galaxy S IIIT-Mobile HTC One S
Pricing$280 (16GB), $330 (32GB)$200 (price may vary online)
Dimensions5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inch (136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm)5.15 x 2.56 x 0.31 inch (130.9 x 65 x 7.8 mm)
Weight4.69 oz (133 g)4.22 oz (120 g)
Screen size4.8 inches4.3 inches
Screen resolution1280 x 720 pixels (306ppi)960 x 540 (256ppi)
Screen typeSuper AMOLED HDSuper AMOLED
Gorilla GlassGorilla Glass 2Gorilla Glass
Battery2,100mAh (7.89Wh)1,650mAh
Internal Storage16GB / 32GB options16GB
External StorageNone included, MicroSDXC compatible (up to 64GB)No external memory options
Rear camera8MP, AF, LED flash, f/2.68MP, AF, LED, f/2.0
Front-facing cam2MPVGA
Video capture1080p HD1080p HD
NFCYesNo
Network speedsDC HSPA+ 42MbpsDC HSPA+ 42Mbps
Bluetooth4.04.0
CPU1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 (MSM8960)1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 (MSM8260A)
GPUAdreno 225Adreno 225
RAM2GB1GB
MHLYes (special adapter needed)Yes
WiFib/g/n/ab/g/n
Supported multimedia formatsMP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, FLAC, WMA, AMR, OGG, MPEG4, H.263, H.264, DivX, WMVMP3, AAC, WMA, WAV, M4A, AMR, OGG, MIDI, MPEG4, H.263, H.264, WMV, 3G2, 3GPP
Wrap-up
And then there were three. Of the six US mobile operators committed to bringing the Galaxy S III to their customers, we've now had the opportunity to play with half of these models. As far as major national carriers, we're still waiting on Verizon Wireless, while US Cellular and C Spire are bringing up the rear as the regional options. The more we see of these phones, the more we're impressed at how amazingly alike they truly are -- and yes, that's a great thing for everyone in the good ol' US of A. It ensures that everyone has the chance to use one of the best smartphones we've ever seen, and they can do so without incurring massive wireless bills in the process.
When looking at T-Mobile's current lineup, there's no doubt in our minds that the Samsung Galaxy S III is our number one choice, so long as price isn't a factor. The HTC One S is still a great performer and will be ideal for anyone wary of TouchWiz, the price tag or the larger frame, but Sammy's darling offers the same amazing performance -- with a beautiful HD display, to boot. It's a tough device to say no to; if you're worried about the temptation, you may want to avoid eye contact for a while... or at least hide your wallet somewhere.

Dell XPS 14 review: a 14-inch Ultrabook with Ivy Bridge and graphics might









While we can't say that we universally liked Dell's first attempt at an Ultrabook, the XPS 13 we reviewed about three months ago, we can quite confidently say that it earned our respect. Here was a smartly styled, sophisticated machine free of stickers and bloatware from a company that, let's be honest, has delivered its share of each over the years. That machine was far from perfect, but it showed a purity of vision in design that you couldn't help but acknowledge.
So where do you go from there? Why, you go bigger of course. Meet the new Dell XPS 14, successor in name only to a model that went out of production over a year ago. It is, as you might have guessed, an inch larger than the XPS 13 and so has more room for ports and pixels -- but there's more to it than that. In some ways this feels like a more polished machine than the 13 that came before, and it's certainly faster but it, too, is far from perfect. Join us for a joyous exploration of why.
Look and feel

This is not the 10 percent scaled-up clone you might be expecting.

We were kind of blown away when unboxing the XPS 13. It was a sleek, finely hewn husk of aluminum nestled inside of a dark, sophisticated box. The attention to design was obvious in every facet of the thing -- except for the decidedly low-rent power brick that came along for the ride. The feeling for the XPS 14 is, unsurprisingly, much the same, but this is not the 10 percent scaled-up clone you might be expecting.
It's largely the same clean, simple visual language here. The lid is a similar aluminum design with the glossy, embossed Dell logo again stuck square in the middle and standing out as the least aesthetically pleasing part of this package. From above, then, this looks just like a bigger 13, but flip it over and things change.
Here, now, is a large rubberized pad upon which the laptop sits, surrounded by a slightly elevated soft-touch ring with slots on the front for the speakers and on the back for the (unfortunately noisy) CPU ventilation. It's a far cry from the XPS 13's über-cool carbon fiber bottom casing, its coy weave subtly exposed to the world. But, to be fair, while silicone and rubber don't look anywhere near as cool as carbon, how often are you looking at the underside of your laptop?
The 14 does at least borrow the XPS 13's metallic flap covering the Windows serial number and all the various numerals and certifications the product passed on its way to retail. This hides all the unsightly logos and stickers and makes for a much cleaner look.
The edge of the 14 is comprised of an aluminum ring punctuated throughout with ports, lights and the big hinge along the back. On the left, starting at the back, you'll find a hole for that unsightly AC adapter, followed by Ethernet, HDMI, Mini DisplayPort and a pair of USB 3.0 ports. Turn to the right and there's much less clutter, just a Kensington Security Slot, an SD card slot and a combination 3.5mm headphone / microphone jack. On the front, there's just a single sliver of a light and nothing more.
It's a reasonably healthy complement of ports, and we welcome the addition of the SD reader that was sadly missing on the XPS 13, but with all that room on the right we wouldn't have minded another USB port or two. There's certainly space. We also miss the battery charge indicator found on the 13.
The overall package weighs a healthy 4.6 pounds (2.1kg) and measures 0.81 inches (22.07mm) thick. It's 13.2 inches wide and 9.2 inches deep (335.8 x 233mm). Those are the dimensions for the model we reviewed, packing 802.11a/g/n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. Dell also offers Intel Wireless Display here, but should you need even more connectivity, there is a range of models offering WWAN connectivity which, interestingly, sport a "full-grain charcoal gray leather" lid instead of the anodized aluminum you'll see in our photos.
Sadly, rich Corinthian leather is not an option, but you will have your choice of WiMAX, EVDO/HSPA, HSPA+ or Dell's own NetReady prepaid service. Should you opt for any of these extended wireless options, you'll be looking at an even heftier laptop, moving up to 4.88 pounds (2.2kg) and 0.91 inches (23.2mm) thick.
Keyboard and trackpad
Unsurprisingly, the keyboard here is more or less exactly what we diddled on the XPS 13. It's an island-style layout with smallish, well-separated keys. They're on the springy side and have good enough feel, but their size isn't particularly well-suited for fingers that are of the larger size. Also, the 'Y' key has a very curious sound when depressed that almost makes the laptop sound hollow. We presume it isn't, though we'll leave that to iFixit to verify.

The 'Y' key has a very curious sound when depressed that almost makes the laptop sound hollow. We presume it isn't, though we'll leave that to iFixit to verify.

The trackpad is, again, much the same as on the 13. It has a tacky, soft-touch feel that isn't nearly as pleasing to the fingers as the glass units manufacturers have been packing. It's of the clickable type, with a single, short line on the bottom designating the space allocated for left or right clicking.
Nothing new there, but yet we found the overall feel and responsiveness to be much improved over our time spent swiping around in the XPS 13. Sliding and gesturing here is a far more pleasurable experience than it was on that machine. The overall experience still doesn't match that of the class-leading Apple MacBooks, but it's respectably close.
Display and sound
The 14-inch display here offers a fair number of pixels for a display of this size: 1600 x 900 to be precise. This, in a 16:9 orientation makes for a comfortable amount of screen real estate without creating a laptop too small to be comfortably used on the tray table of seat 36C. Of course, it would be more comfortable in seat 2A, but sometimes we all have to fly coach, and the XPS 14 is well-sized for that duty.
The display is bright enough to be used in sunny situations, too, showing respectable contrast; though color temperature gets increasingly cool the higher we crank that backlight. Viewing angles are more than adequate when the laptop is turned from side-to-side, but look at it from above or below and the contrast quickly falls to unacceptable levels. You'll want to make use of that hinge to keep this non-IPS panel properly perpendicular.

Sometimes we all have to fly coach, and the XPS 14 is well-sized for that duty.

You'll also want to make sure you don't have much in the way of bright objects behind you, because there's no matte option here. Every XPS 14 has an edge-to-edge Corning Gorilla Glass panel that should eradicate any concerns about accidental scratches, but it's more reflective than some other glossy displays, particularly the one found in the MacBook Air.
And then there's the sound. Speakers are built into the bottom of the laptop, under the front lip, which is a somewhat curious and, it must be said, often less-than-optimal place. Set this thing on a soft surface (carpet, bedspread, bearskin rug) and the sound will be muffled. But, when the grille opening isn't blocked, the XPS 14 packs a surprising punch. Overall audio quality isn't immaculate, but for a laptop of this size, or any size really, we were impressed by the output levels here. It's more than adequate for an impromptu hotel suite dance party. Just make sure you close the blinds first.
Performance and battery life
You can get your XPS 14 specced with Intel processors ranging from a Core i5-3317U chip clocked at 1.7GHz all the way up to the range-topping Core i7-3667U at 2.0GHz. We're testing the highest-spec processor available on the non-business models, a 1.9GHz Core i7-3517U CPU with 4MB of cache.
Predictably, it performs reasonably well, particularly since it pairs the Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics with an NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M graphics chip flaunting 1GB of GDDR5 memory. There's some Optimus technology sitting between them to make sure you're only using as much graphics horsepower as you need.

While the small SSD helps resume time, it's obviously not doing much for day-to-day performance.

PCMark Vantage gave us a score of 10,003, which is slightly on the low side compared even to the lower-powered Samsung Series 9 tested a few months back, and thoroughly underwhelming compared to the 13,469 the latest MacBook Air delivered. Also low is disk I/O performance, showing max writes of just 108 MB/s and reads of 142 MB/s. That's coming from a 5,400 RPM, 500GB paired with a 32GB solid-state drive and, while the small SSD helps resume time (less than three seconds), it's obviously not doing much for day-to-day performance -- nor startup. A cold boot takes nearly 45 seconds.
Thankfully, things are much better on the graphics performance side, a 3DMark06 score of 6,995 is among the highest we've seen from an Ultrabook, easily besting the scores of those other two mentioned above. Thanks be to NVIDIA on that one.
PCMark Vantage3DMark06
Dell XPS 14 (1.9GHz Core i7, NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M)10,0036,995
MacBook Air (2012, 1.8GHz Core i5, Intel HD Graphics 4000)13,4695,827
ASUS Zenbook UX31 (1.7GHz Core i5-2557M, Intel HD Graphics 3000)10,5084,209
ASUS Zenbook Prime UX21A (Ivy Bridge Core i7 processor, Intel HD Graphics 4000)10,3334,550
Lenovo IdeaPad U300s (1.8GHz Core i7-2677M, Intel HD Graphics 3000)9,9393,651
Samsung Series 9 (15-inch, 2012, 1.6GHz Core i5-2467M, Intel HD Graphics 3000)10,5804,171
MacBook Air (2011, 1.7GHz Core i5-2557M, Intel HD Graphics 3000)9,4844,223
Note: higher scores are better
The performance may not be world-class, but we're happy to say that we found the XPS 14 to deliver plenty of longevity for us, scoring an impressive six hours and 18 minutes on our standard run-down test, endlessly looping a video with WiFi turned on and the display at a fixed brightness. That's right in the ballpark of last year's Inspiron 14Z and over a full hour healthier than the four hours and 58 minutes the XPS 13 managed before throwing in the towel.
Battery life
Dell XPS 14 (Core i7-3517U)6:18
Samsung Series 9 (15-inch, 2012)7:29
Lenovo ThinkPad X2307:19
MacBook Air (13-inch, 2012)6:34 (OS X) / 4:28 (Windows)
HP Folio 136:08
Toshiba Portege Z8355:49
ASUS Zenbook UX315:41
MacBook Air (13-inch, 2011)5:32 (Mac OS X) / 4:12 (Windows)
HP Envy 14 Spectre5:30
Lenovo IdeaPad U300s5:08
Samsung Series 5 Ultrabook (14-inch, 2012)5:06
Dell XPS 134:58
Samsung Series 9 (13-inch, 2011)4:20
ASUS Zenbook Prime UX21A4:19
If indeed there is a drawback here, it's in some rather distracting fan noise. Do some serious work on this machine (like, say, running an endless string of benchmarks back to back) and the fan will certainly make its presence known. Even when doing less intensive tasks, like streaming YouTube's latest hits, we quite often heard the noisy little thing spinning itself up.
Configuration options
Again, Dell is offering Intel processors ranging from a 1.7GHz Core i5-3317U chip up to the 3.1GHz Core i7-3667U at 2.0GHz, which is available only to businesses. RAM is 1333MHz DDR3 in your choice of 4GB or 8GB quantities and storage starts at a 5,400 RPM, 500GB disk and goes up to a 512GB SSD. All models offer Intel's integrated HD 4000 graphics, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M with Optimus tech is optional. The 14-inch, 1600 x 900 non-IPS panel is standard on all.
The lowest spec model starts at a perfectly respectable $1,099, but tick all those boxes and get yourself the SSD with all the fixins and you'll nearly double that figure, up to $1,999. Our configuration, which has every option save the SSD, costs a rather more manageable $1,499.
The competition
We're still waiting for all the manufacturers to bring their Ivy Bridge boys to the yard so that we can tell you whether they're better than ours. Dell is at a slight advantage by beating most of them to market, but it isn't the first, and there are certainly plenty of Sandy Bridge-powered Ultrabooks to stack it up against.
Dell's smaller, older and cheaper XPS 13, with a Core i7 Sandy Bridge processor and 256GB SSD, comes out cheaper than the model we tested here. But, if you can manage an even larger laptop, the XPS 15 comes with faster CPUs, more storage and even an optical drive for prices ranging from $1,299 to $1,999.
We're guessing some will be cross-shopping this with Apple's offerings, and though the largest Air gives up an inch of screen real estate and some resolution (1440 horizontal pixels vs. 1600 here) it is a superior panel in every other regard. It's also a comparably quick machine and also offers competitive battery life but much, much faster disk I/O thanks to its 500+ MB/s SSDs -- but you will be paying slightly more. It's $1,499 for a Core i5 model with 4GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. Going to a Core i7 chip and 8GB of RAM adds $200, and the 512GB SSD is a painful $500 addition.
Wrap-up
It's easy to see the XPS 14 as just a slightly larger version of the 13 that came so recently before, but that's far from telling the full story. Yes, this looks an awful lot like that one, but it's considerably heavier, considerably faster and has a considerably better trackpad. It is, therefore, a considerably better laptop -- if you don't mind that extra heft -- but it's far from perfect. Disk I/O performance left us wanting, solid speaker performance is offset by a distracting fan and the LCD, though good, sits only on the higher side of adequate.
If you can make do with a smaller, lower-res screen (and a rather different OS) you can get a similar-performing MacBook Air for an MSRP that's in the same ballpark or, heading in the other direction, there's the even larger XPS 15. Beyond that, it's looking like a long summer of Ivy Bridge Ultrabooks, and we still don't know what wonders the rest of the year holds. But, right now, the XPS 14 makes its mark as a respectable performer with a solid design at a fair price. It's not destined to be a standout, but rest easy knowing it is, at least, a respectably safe purchase.